View Single Post
Old 06-28-2007, 06:20 PM   #59 (permalink)
tunaman81
Hooked Up
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
Occupation: student
Posts: 388
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by quack quack View Post

QQ You are wrong on this one.If not for the pollution and better manegment the bass stocks could have handled the fishing preasure.Go read the book Striper by John Cole.
Not quite. The striper stocks didn't really improve all that much until the commercial fishery was stopped. Then the populations greatly increased. The span of time it took for the stock to rebuild was very quick, and the environmental conditions didn't change all that much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by quack quack View Post

QQ Yes one species in a certain area may only be efeccted directly by a certain polutant but everything in that speices environment gets effected.Just because a fish is not commercialy harvested it does have it's place in the eco system.
That is true, however, you are neglecting the fact that wile one fish may only be affected by pollutants, the species being commercially fished has to face both the problem of pollution AND fishing pressure. Pollution may only be taking a small toll, but coupled with fishing pressure the problem becomes a lot bigger.
__________________
There is nothing like fishing the deep blue offshore waters
tunaman81 is offline   Reply With Quote